One can find that the predicting
the life time of the structure is very complicated subject. As after collecting
all the required data about the strength and loads still the time of the
structure failure is varies from structure to another depending on many factors.
According to many researchers are
interesting to focus about the buildings life time as they found that there are
some materials and structures have a longer life time than the other.
Throughout history, service-life predictions of structures, equipment, and other components were generally qualitative and empirical. The first step it is required to understand the causes of many degradation processes and identifying the reasons is the main step for making quantitative predictions of the service life of concrete structures and its components. In addition to actual or potential structural failure, many other factors can govern the service life of a concrete structure, for example, excessive operating costs or major repair cost can lead to a structure's replacement.
Throughout history, service-life predictions of structures, equipment, and other components were generally qualitative and empirical. The first step it is required to understand the causes of many degradation processes and identifying the reasons is the main step for making quantitative predictions of the service life of concrete structures and its components. In addition to actual or potential structural failure, many other factors can govern the service life of a concrete structure, for example, excessive operating costs or major repair cost can lead to a structure's replacement.
In most
text books usually used expression durability and service life as the terms
"durability" and "service life" are often erroneously
interchanged. The distinction between the two terms is evident when their
definitions, as given in ASTM E 632, are compared and defined the durability
as, its capability of maintaining the serviceability of a building, component,
assembly, or construction over a specified time. Serviceability is viewed as
the capacity of the above to perform the function(s) for which they are designed
and constructed.
The
definition of Service life is defined by
by three types
of service life have been defined which are:
·
Technical service life is the time in which the
building in service until shown
unacceptable state is reached, such as spalling of concrete, safety
level below acceptable, or failure of elements.
· Functional service life is the time in service until the structure no longer fulfills the functional requirements or becomes obsolete due to change in functional requirements, such as the needs for increase clearance, higher axle and wheel loads, or road widening in case of bridges.
· Economic service life is the time in service until replacement of the structure (or part of it) is economically more advantageous than keeping it in service or repairing or strengthening it.
· Functional service life is the time in service until the structure no longer fulfills the functional requirements or becomes obsolete due to change in functional requirements, such as the needs for increase clearance, higher axle and wheel loads, or road widening in case of bridges.
· Economic service life is the time in service until replacement of the structure (or part of it) is economically more advantageous than keeping it in service or repairing or strengthening it.
The
service-life methodologies have been included
in the design stage of a structure-where certain parameters are established and this is clear in EC2. The
some of the parameters that affect by defining the service life of the structure
as selection of water-cementitious materials ratios (w/c), concrete
cover, and admixtures-and in the operation phase where inspection and
maintenance strategies can be developed in support of life-cycle cost analyses.
According
to CEBIRILEM 1986 service-life design
includes the architectural and structural design, selection and design of
materials, maintenance plans, and quality assurance and quality control plans
for a future structure. Based on mixture proportioning, including selection of
concrete components, known material properties, expected service environment,
structural detailing such as concrete cover, construction methods, the loading
history, and the definition of end-of-life, the service life can be predicted
and concrete with a reasonable assurance can achieve the design service life as
discussed by Elreedy MA (2012).
There are
many trials to develop a method to predict the service life of existing
concrete structures. To predict the service life of existing concrete
structures, information is required on the present condition of concrete, rates
of degradation, past and future loading, and definition of the end-of-life as
mention that Clifton (1991). Based on remaining life predictions, economic
decisions which is usually the responsibility to the owner to take the
decision on whether or not a structure
should be repaired, rehabilitated, or replaced.
It is worth to mention that, all
decisions concerning the definition of end of-life are combined with human
safety and economic considerations. In most cases, the condition, appearance,
or capacity of a structure can be upgraded to an acceptable level; however,
costs associated with the upgrade can be prohibitive.
The service life of new and
existing concrete structures is influenced by measures taken during design and
construction to resist degradation from imposed loads and environmental
conditions (for example, the degree of durability). Durability brings the time
element into the design of reinforced concrete structures and should be given
equal importance to that given to strength. It is worth to mention that, design
and construction currently consist of seven which are as follow:
1) Design loads and actions;
2) Performance criteria;
3) Factors of safety, or
reliability;
4) Design and detailing;
5) Material specifications;
6) Workmanship and construction
practices
7) Minimum levels of maintenance.
Provisions for durability in the
past have primarily been addressed under Items 5 and 6. It is important to
mention that the design for durability requires essentially an improved
understanding of the degradation mechanisms, improved characterization of
service environments, data on materials, the development of advanced models,
and the development of standards and guidelines for the use of design methods
and acceptance for durability predictions.
To predict the concrete structure
life time, it needs a complete evaluation for the whole building by visual
inspection, collecting data and provide some experimental test if needed.
The data which will be collect
and evaluate will be in three directions which are the loads, the environmental
condition surrounding the building and the structural strength.
When start to predict the life
time of the structure it is very important to know the loads that have been
affect the building from its construction until the time of evaluation and the
expecting loads that affecting the structure for upcoming years.
The most
important design parameter is the definition of structural loads. Minimum
design loads and load combinations are prescribed by legally adopted building
codes for example, ACI 318, or ASCE7. There is a balance between selection of a
design to meet minimum loading conditions and the design responsibility is to
provide a conservative design that results in higher initial price but can
provide lower life-cycle cost.
If the
design is go through another approach by provide the least cost building with
minimum load mention in the codes but this can design approach will need a
higher life cycle cost and this can be more susceptible to degradation than the
more conservative design approach.
Predicting service life of new concrete , in most cases the selection of the
concrete materials and design mix of the concrete based o the laboratory test
and its expectation for its behavior after pouring on site. But this approach
is based on the concrete is durable materials regardless the surrounded
environmental condition and it has a service life according to the codes which
in most cases around 25 years. Now a days due to enhanced the materials of
concrete and there are a new materials developed in the market such as
additives, silica fume , slag , fly ash and others so we have the opportunity
to choose the materials additives that will enhance the properties of concrete
in harsh environment and as a result of that the concrete can reach the
required service life without
maintenance cost during its life time.
There are
many service-life prediction methods focus on the effect of one degradation
process. Experience, however, has shown that degradation results when one or
more degradation processes are operative or if there is a combination between
the environmental condition and the loads.
- Predictions based on experience-Semiquantitative predictions
- Comparison performance approach
- Accelerated testing
- Mathematical models-Mathematical
This
combination effect complicates the prediction of the new concrete structures
service-life prediction for both new concrete structures where environmental
factors and loads may have not been well defined, and existing structures where
the contribution to degradation by various influences is difficult to assess.
The main factors that affect the service life of reinforced concrete structures
include the presence of chlorides, carbonation, aggressive chemicals, such as
acids and sulfates, freezing-and thawing cycling, and mechanical loads, such as
fatigue, vibration, and local overloads. Typically, only one primary factor
limits the service life and is the focus of service-life prediction. As limited
information is available on the synergistic effect when more than one factor is
operative.
Mohamed
A. El-Reedy, Ph.D